GDPR-K Article 83(4)-(5) - General conditions for imposing administrative fines (tiers applicable to the child-related provi…
Article 8 and the Article 25, 32, 35 and 37 duties are in the EUR 10 million / 2% tier (Article 83(4)(a)); Articles 5, 6, 7, 9 and 12-22 are in the EUR 20 million / 4% tier (Article 83(5)); children are not a listed Article 83(2) factor
Where this comes from
Provision: Article 83(4)-(5) - General conditions for imposing administrative fines (tiers applicable to the child-related provisions)
Instrument: General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679
Citation: Regulation (EU) 2016/679, OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, Article 83(2), 83(4)(a) and 83(5)(a)-(b)
Text version: Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR), OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, as adopted (CELEX 32016R0679), read from the Publications Office Cellar manifestation on 2026-09-21 because EUR-Lex served an empty body to non-browser clients; the 2018 corrigendum (OJ L 127, 23.5.2018) was not retrievable, so any correction it made is unverified.
Who it applies to
It applies when all of these are true:
- Service is likely to be accessed by children under 18
What engineering work it implies
Sample acceptance criteria Landfall generates for this obligation:
- Provision recorded in the compliance register with an accountable owner
- Team briefed on the exposure / penalties and the conditions that trigger them
- Register entry is flagged for review on any relevant regulatory change
Questions people ask
- Does GDPR-K Article 83(4)-(5) - General conditions for imposing administrative fin… apply to my service?
- It applies when Service is likely to be accessed by children under 18.
- From when does this apply?
- GDPR-K Article 83(4)-(5) - General conditions for imposing administrative fin… applies from 25 May 2018. Its current status is: in force.
Find out whether this one lands on you
Landfall's pre-scan answers the applicability question above for your product in minutes, then turns every obligation that applies into traceable engineering tickets with a citation chain your auditors can follow.
Not legal advice. Landfall maps regulatory obligations to engineering work for planning purposes. Its verdicts are not legal advice and create no attorney-client relationship — verify with qualified counsel before relying on them.