Skip to content
UK OSA · UK-OSA-AGE-VERIFICATION-STANDARDS

UK OSA Section 82 - OFCOM's guidance about the duties in section 81 (Part 5 highly effective age assurance), read with secti…

Services likely to be accessed by children must use proportionate and effective age assurance measures compliant with Ofcom standards for accuracy, privacy, and accessibility

HIGHRecommendationAge verificationRegulatory guidanceIn forceApplies from 26 October 2023

Where this comes from

Provision: Section 82 - OFCOM's guidance about the duties in section 81 (Part 5 highly effective age assurance), read with section 53

Instrument: UK Online Safety Act 2023

Citation: Online Safety Act 2023, c. 50, s 82 (OFCOM's guidance about the s 81 duties) and s 53 (OFCOM's guidance on content harmful to children and user empowerment); the underlying duties are s 81(2)-(3) (Part 5) and s 12(4)-(6) (Part 3). Ofcom guidance document title, publication date and version NOT VERIFIED - see confidenceNotes.

Text version: Online Safety Act 2023 c. 50, revised text as displayed on legislation.gov.uk on 2026-09-21 ('up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 21 September 2026'), including the amendments made by the Crime and Policing Act 2026 in force from 29 June 2026 (S.I. 2026/689) and s 66 in force from 7 April 2026 (S.I. 2026/262). The as-enacted text is superseded.

Read the official text ↗

Who it applies to

Child audience (designed for OR likely accessed by children) — any one of these:

  • Service is specifically designed for children under 18
  • Service is likely to be accessed by children under 18

Remaining applicability scope — all of these:

  • Youngest user age is Under 13, 13-15 or 16-17
  • Service requires/offers account registration

Scope in the source's own terms

  • Service likely accessed by children
  • Service available in the United Kingdom

What engineering work it implies

Sample acceptance criteria Landfall generates for this obligation:

  • Default profile visibility: private (not public)
  • Default data sharing: off (opt-in, not opt-out)
  • Default location tracking: off
  • Default contact discoverability: off
  • User can change any default via settings

Evidence an auditor expects

  • Technical controlTechnical audit

    Age verification/estimation system

    Implementation of age assurance meeting Ofcom guidance standards

  • Test resultsTechnical auditRecommended

    Age assurance effectiveness testing

    Test results demonstrating age verification effectiveness

Questions people ask

Does UK OSA Section 82 - OFCOM's guidance about the duties in section 81 (Part 5 h… apply to my service?
It applies when at least one of: Service is specifically designed for children under 18; Service is likely to be accessed by children under 18; and Youngest user age is Under 13, 13-15 or 16-17; Service requires/offers account registration.
From when does this apply?
UK OSA Section 82 - OFCOM's guidance about the duties in section 81 (Part 5 h… applies from 26 October 2023. Its current status is: in force.
What evidence does an auditor expect?
Age verification/estimation system; Age assurance effectiveness testing.

Find out whether this one lands on you

Landfall's pre-scan answers the applicability question above for your product in minutes, then turns every obligation that applies into traceable engineering tickets with a citation chain your auditors can follow.

Not legal advice. Landfall maps regulatory obligations to engineering work for planning purposes. Its verdicts are not legal advice and create no attorney-client relationship — verify with qualified counsel before relying on them.

What Landfall Is NOT

Critical Boundaries

Understanding these boundaries is essential before using this product. Misuse of this tool for purposes outside its scope may create legal, regulatory, or commercial risk for your organization.

NOT Legal Advice

This product does not provide legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Interpretations are informational analysis, not legal counsel. Always consult qualified legal professionals for compliance decisions.

NOT a Risk Score

We do not quantify, calculate, or certify your compliance risk level.

No numerical risk rating, compliance percentage, or safety score. Risk assessment requires human judgment about your specific context.

NOT Runtime Enforcement

This is a planning and mapping tool, not a runtime enforcement system.

Does not integrate with your production systems. Does not block, filter, or enforce compliance in real-time. Implementation is your responsibility.

NOT Regulatory Approval

Using this tool does not mean you are compliant with any regulation.

No certification, seal of approval, or compliance guarantee. Regulators will evaluate your actual implementation, not your use of this tool.

NOT Authoritative Interpretation

Our interpretations are not binding and may differ from regulatory guidance.

Only regulators and courts provide authoritative interpretation. Our analysis reflects our reading of requirements, which may be incomplete or incorrect.

NOT a Safe Harbor

This tool does not shield you from enforcement actions or liability.

Documentation of your process is valuable, but does not constitute a legal defense. Compliance is ultimately your organization's responsibility.

NOT an AI Compliance Agent

AI features assist analysis but do not make compliance decisions for you.

AI-generated interpretations require human review and approval. Automated suggestions are starting points, not final answers.

NOT Complete Coverage

We do not cover all regulations, all obligations, or all jurisdictions.

Regulatory landscape is vast and evolving. Gaps in our coverage do not mean those requirements don't apply to you.

What This Tool IS:

  • A structured workflow for mapping regulatory requirements to implementation tasks
  • A documentation system for compliance decisions (audit trail)
  • A collaboration platform for compliance, legal, and engineering teams
  • An informational resource for understanding regulatory obligations