Skip to content

IE OSC

Ireland Online Safety Code

Coimisiún na Meán's binding code for designated video-sharing platform services.

20 obligations in this framework — full source text, applicability logic, and engineering tickets inside Landfall.

20 obligation pages · last updated 6 November 2026

IE-OSC-ADVERTISING-STANDARDSHIGHRequirementTransparency

Preclude and never sell commercial communications harmful to the public or to children or restricted; make advertising recognisable, never surreptitious or subliminal; let uploaders declare it and tell viewers (Code s 13)

Online Safety Code, Part B s 13 (paras 13.1-13.15) - Audiovisual commercial communications: terms for user-uploaded communications, the provider's own sales, recognisability, no surreptitious or subliminal techniques, uploader declaration, informing viewers, alcohol carve-out; Part A s 10 (paras 10.2-10.4, 10.6(b)-(c)) · Read the full page →

Featured — source excerpt“Online Safety Code, Part B s 13 (cnam.ie, retrieved 2026-09-21), verbatim: 13.1: "A video-sharing platform service provider shall, in the case of audiovisual commercial communications not...”
IE-OSC-AGE-ASSURANCECRITICALRequirementAge Verification

Where the terms do not preclude adult-only video content, implement effective age assurance (not self-declaration alone) so children cannot normally see it, and keep the age data out of commercial use

Online Safety Code, Part B s 12 (para 12.10) - Age assurance for adult-only video content; Part A s 10 (paras 10.6(f), 10.8, 10.9); s 17 (para 17.2) · Read the full page →

Featured — source excerpt“Online Safety Code, Part B para 12.10 (cnam.ie, retrieved 2026-09-21), verbatim: "A video-sharing platform service provider whose terms and conditions do not preclude the uploading or sharing of...”
IE-OSC-ANNUAL-COMPLIANCEHIGHDisclosureGovernance

Report to the Commission every 3 months (or as it specifies) on the handling of user complaints and other communications, and keep systems and controls that demonstrate compliance

Online Safety Code, Part B s 17 (para 17.3) - Report to the Commission every 3 months, or as specified, on the handling of user complaints and other communications; Part A s 9 (para 9.3 systems and controls to demonstrate compliance) · Read the full page →

Featured — source excerpt“Online Safety Code (cnam.ie, retrieved 2026-09-21), verbatim: para 17.3: "Pursuant to Section 139K(6) of the Act, each video-sharing platform service provider shall provide a report to the...”
IE-OSC-APPEALS-MECHANISMHIGHProcessUser Rights

Operate transparent, easy-to-use complaints procedures about age assurance, content rating, parental controls and reporting and flagging, handled diligently and without discrimination; Digital Services Act Article 20 moderation decisions are excluded

Online Safety Code, Part B s 16 (paras 16.1-16.4) - Complaints about age assurance, content rating, parental controls and reporting and flagging; Digital Services Act Article 20(1)(a)-(d) decisions excluded; Part A s 10 (para 10.6(i)) · Read the full page →

IE-OSC-CONTACT-POINTMEDIUMRequirementGovernance

WITHDRAWN ATTRIBUTION — not a verified statutory duty. The record cited Part A s 11 for a designated contact point for the Commission, users and other authorities with authority and competence to engage on compliance; s 11 is Part B's definitions section and the Code as retrieved from cnam.ie on 2026-09-21 (ss 1-17) contains no contact-point duty. Points of contact for authorities and for recipients are Articles 11 and 12 of the Digital Services Act.

Online Safety Code, Part A s 11 (Part B definitions) - withdrawn attribution (no contact-point duty in the Code) · Read the full page →

IE-OSC-CONTENT-MODERATIONCRITICALProcessGovernance

Apply the s 12 terms and, after a prior warning, suspend frequent infringers for a reasonable period, assessed case by case with regard to fundamental rights, except where the Digital Services Act already covers the consequence

Online Safety Code, Part B s 12 (paras 12.6-12.9) - Applying the terms; suspension of frequent infringers after a prior warning; case-by-case assessment; fundamental rights; Digital Services Act limit; Part A s 5 (para 5.3 no general monitoring) · Read the full page →

IE-OSC-DESIGNATED-CLASSIFICATIONHIGHRequirementGovernance

The Code binds named designated video-sharing platform services in full; providers must keep systems and controls that demonstrate compliance, and non-compliance is a Part 8B contravention

Online Safety Code, Part A s 2 (paras 2.2-2.3) - Applies to named designated video-sharing platform services on the Commission's register; s 1 (para 1.5) - Entirety binding; s 9 (paras 9.1-9.3) - Contravention under Part 8B, proportionality, systems and controls to demonstrate compliance · Read the full page →

IE-OSC-HATE-TERRORISMCRITICALRequirementGovernance

Preclude incitement to violence or hatred on the Charter Article 21 grounds and terrorist, child sexual abuse and racism offence content in the terms; apply the terms and make it reportable

Online Safety Code, Part B s 11 (restricted video content (e)-(f): incitement to violence or hatred on the Charter Article 21 grounds; terrorist provocation, child sexual abuse material and racism and xenophobia offences); s 12 (para 12.1; paras 12.6-12.9); s 15 (para 15.1); Part A s 10 (para 10.1(b)-(c)) · Read the full page →

IE-OSC-RESEARCHER-ACCESSMEDIUMRequirementTransparency

WITHDRAWN ATTRIBUTION — not a verified statutory duty. The record cited Part A s 9, the Code's compliance and enforcement section, for a duty to give researchers vetted by the Commission or academic institutions privacy-preserving access to platform data and to cooperate with Commission-endorsed research requests. The Code as retrieved from cnam.ie on 2026-09-21 (ss 1-17) contains no researcher-access provision; data access for vetted researchers is Article 40 of the Digital Services Act, for very large online platforms.

Online Safety Code, Part A s 9 (compliance and enforcement) - withdrawn attribution (no researcher-access duty in the Code) · Read the full page →

IE-OSC-RISK-ASSESSMENTCRITICALAssessmentRisk Assessment

WITHDRAWN ATTRIBUTION — not a verified statutory duty. The record cited Part A s 2, the Code's scope section, for a duty to conduct a risk assessment of harmful content with four required considerations, reviewed annually or on material change. The Code as retrieved from cnam.ie on 2026-09-21 (ss 1-17) contains no risk-assessment duty: its 'risk test' (s 11) is a content definition, not a process, and its only compliance-systems provision is s 9.3 (systems and controls to demonstrate compliance), carried by IE-OSC-DESIGNATED-CLASSIFICATION. Risk assessments are Article 34 of the Digital Services Act, for very large online platforms.

Online Safety Code, Part A s 2 (scope) - withdrawn attribution (no risk-assessment duty in the Code) · Read the full page →

IE-OSC-SELF-HARM-SUICIDECRITICALRequirementGovernance

Preclude content promoting, encouraging or giving methods of self-harm or suicide, including dangerous challenges, that meets the risk test; apply the terms and make it reportable

Online Safety Code, Part B s 11 (restricted video content (c)-(d): promoting or encouraging self-harm or suicide, methods of self-harm or suicide, including dangerous challenges, with the risk test); s 12 (para 12.1; paras 12.6-12.9); s 15 (para 15.1) · Read the full page →

IE-OSC-SENIOR-MANAGEMENTLOWAssessmentGovernance

WITHDRAWN ATTRIBUTION — not a verified statutory duty. The record cited Part A s 7A for a named senior manager accountable for compliance, a board reporting line and notification of the manager to the Commission. The Code as retrieved from cnam.ie on 2026-09-21 (ss 1-17) has no s 7A (s 7 is severability) and contains no senior-management accountability duty; s 9.3 requires systems and controls to demonstrate compliance without naming an individual. Already in WITHDRAWN_ATTRIBUTION_IDS; this pass states the reason in the record's text.

Online Safety Code, Part A s 7A (does not exist) - withdrawn attribution (no senior-management accountability duty in the Code) · Read the full page →

IE-OSC-TERMS-CONDITIONSCRITICALRequirementGovernance

Terms and conditions must preclude restricted video content and restricted indissociable user-generated content, preclude or require rating of adult-only video content, and bar circumvention (Code paras 12.1-12.5)

Online Safety Code, Part B s 12 (paras 12.1-12.5) - Terms and conditions and related obligations: restricted video content, restricted indissociable user-generated content, adult-only video content, no circumvention · Read the full page →

IE-OSC-TRANSPARENCY-REPORTSHIGHDisclosureTransparency

WITHDRAWN ATTRIBUTION — not a verified statutory duty. The record cited Part A s 10, the Audiovisual Media Services Directive obligations section, for a duty to publish transparency reports and give them to the Commission with seven data points (report volumes by category, moderation actions, automated-tool accuracy, appeal volumes and outcomes, median processing times, Irish user counts, moderator resourcing with Irish-context expertise). The Code as retrieved from cnam.ie on 2026-09-21 (ss 1-17) contains no transparency-report duty; that content is Articles 15, 24 and 42 of the Digital Services Act. The Code's only reporting provision is s 17.3 - a report to the Commission every 3 months, or at other intervals it specifies, on the handling of communications from users raising complaints or other matters - which IE-OSC-ANNUAL-COMPLIANCE now carries.

Online Safety Code, Part A s 10 (AVMSD obligations) - withdrawn attribution (no transparency-report duty in the Code) · Read the full page →

See how these become your engineering backlog

Landfall turns each of the 20 Ireland Online Safety Code obligations into traceable engineering tickets — with full source text, applicability logic, and a citation chain your auditors can follow.

What Landfall Is NOT

Critical Boundaries

Understanding these boundaries is essential before using this product. Misuse of this tool for purposes outside its scope may create legal, regulatory, or commercial risk for your organization.

NOT Legal Advice

This product does not provide legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Interpretations are informational analysis, not legal counsel. Always consult qualified legal professionals for compliance decisions.

NOT a Risk Score

We do not quantify, calculate, or certify your compliance risk level.

No numerical risk rating, compliance percentage, or safety score. Risk assessment requires human judgment about your specific context.

NOT Runtime Enforcement

This is a planning and mapping tool, not a runtime enforcement system.

Does not integrate with your production systems. Does not block, filter, or enforce compliance in real-time. Implementation is your responsibility.

NOT Regulatory Approval

Using this tool does not mean you are compliant with any regulation.

No certification, seal of approval, or compliance guarantee. Regulators will evaluate your actual implementation, not your use of this tool.

NOT Authoritative Interpretation

Our interpretations are not binding and may differ from regulatory guidance.

Only regulators and courts provide authoritative interpretation. Our analysis reflects our reading of requirements, which may be incomplete or incorrect.

NOT a Safe Harbor

This tool does not shield you from enforcement actions or liability.

Documentation of your process is valuable, but does not constitute a legal defense. Compliance is ultimately your organization's responsibility.

NOT an AI Compliance Agent

AI features assist analysis but do not make compliance decisions for you.

AI-generated interpretations require human review and approval. Automated suggestions are starting points, not final answers.

NOT Complete Coverage

We do not cover all regulations, all obligations, or all jurisdictions.

Regulatory landscape is vast and evolving. Gaps in our coverage do not mean those requirements don't apply to you.

What This Tool IS:

  • A structured workflow for mapping regulatory requirements to implementation tasks
  • A documentation system for compliance decisions (audit trail)
  • A collaboration platform for compliance, legal, and engineering teams
  • An informational resource for understanding regulatory obligations